Build my prototype

Modernisation

Application modernisation services

The application everyone complains about is usually also the one that encodes how the business actually works. Replacing it wholesale throws away both.

  • Prototype the replacement first
  • Logic preserved
  • Migration planned, not improvised

The problem

Rewrites fail because the old system knows things nobody wrote down

Years of exceptions, approvals and edge cases live inside the application rather than in any document. A clean-sheet rewrite rediscovers them one production incident at a time, which is why so many modernisation projects end up costing more than the system they replaced.

How we work on this

Prototype first, then the build you approved.

We prototype the replacement of one workflow first and put it in front of the people who use the current system daily. Their reaction surfaces the undocumented rules early. We then modernise in slices, keeping the parts people rely on recognisable, with the data migration and the cutover agreed before anything moves.

What this covers

Capabilities, and where each one stops.

  • Workflow-by-workflow replacement

    Modernising in slices that each deliver something usable, instead of a single switchover with one chance to be right.

  • Data migration

    Moving history with its exceptions intact, and saying plainly what cannot be moved cleanly.

  • Interface modernisation

    A usable, mobile-capable interface over processes your people already know.

  • Integration with what stays

    Keeping the systems you are not replacing connected throughout.

  • Decommissioning plan

    What gets switched off, when, and what is archived first.

We do not recommend a rewrite where a fix would do. If the honest answer is that your current system needs three changes rather than a replacement, that is what the assessment will say.

How it is built

Decisions we make the same way every time.

  • Read-only access to the existing system for assessment
  • Slice-by-slice cutover with a rollback path at each step
  • Parallel running where the risk warrants it
  • Business rules documented as they are found
  • Open export of migrated data at any time

Where this applies

Questions

The questions people ask about this work.

Do we have to replace everything at once?

No, and we would advise against it. We modernise one workflow at a time, each slice usable on its own, with a rollback path.

What happens to our historical data?

It is migrated with its exceptions intact where that is possible, and we tell you plainly where it is not. Your data stays exportable in open formats throughout.

Describe the system you are stuck with

Tell us what it does well and what it makes people do by hand. We will prototype one replacement workflow.

Describe the system you are stuck with →

Start here

A sentence about what is slow, manual or missing is enough. We come back with a view on the fastest useful thing to put in front of you, and an honest answer on whether we are the right people to build it.